Scientific Background – Establishment Labs

Establishment Labs tiene el honor de impulsar la ciencia con base empírica, la innovación y la seguridad para las mujeres y difunde con orgullo las contribuciones científicas que se recopilan.

Cuando se trata de ciencia, innovación y seguridad para las mujeres de todo el mundo, nos gusta hacer correr la voz. Del laboratorio a la prensa.

HISTORIA DE LOS IMPLANTES MAMARIOS

DiPompeo FS, Paolini G, Firmani G, Sorotos M. History of breast implants: back to the future.J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2022. 32 166-177. doi:10.1016/j.jpa.2022.02.004

Ramos-Gallardo G, Vélez-Benítez E, Cuenca-Pardo J, et al. What is the Process for Breast Implant Manufacturing? Inside Eight Breast Implant Factories. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01844-6

SUPERFICIE

Atlan M, Kinney B, Perry TA. Intra-and Inter-Shell Roughness Variability of Breast Implant Surfaces. Aesthet Surg J. Apr 2020; 40(5): NP324-NP326. Doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz36

Barr S, Hill EW, BayatA. Novel Proteomic Assay of Breast Implants Reveals Proteins with Significant Binding Differences: Implications for Surface Coating and Biocompatibility. AesthetSurg J. August 2018; 38(9):962–969. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy018

Doloff JC,Veiseh O, de Mezerville R, et al.The surface topography of silicone breast implants mediates the foreign body response in mice, rabbits and humans. Nature Biomedical engineering. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4

Hallab NJ, SamelkoL, Hammond D. Particulate Debris Released From Breast Implant SurfacesAre Highly Dependent on Implant Type. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2021; doi: sjab051,https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab051

James G, Boegli L, Hancock J et al. Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Textured Breast Implant Shell Materials. Aesth Plast Surg. 2019 Apr; 43:490–497. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1234-7

Jones P, Mempin M, Hu H, et al.The functional influence of breast implant outer shell morphology on bacterial attachment and growth. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(4):837-849.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801

Munhoz AM, Clemens MW, Nahabedia MY. Breast Implant Surfaces and Their Impact on WhereWe Are Now and Where Are we Going. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019 ;7:e2466; doi:10.1097/ GOX.0000000000002466

Rosas JM, Atkins DJ, Chau AL, et al. In vitro models of soft tissue damage by implant-associated frictional shear stresses. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology. 2022;0(0). doi:10.1177/13506501221132897

ERGONOMÍA

Sforza M, Spear S, Hammond D. The 21st Century Silicone Breast Implant. J Surg Open Access2016;2(4). doi: 10.16966/2470-0991.e107

Szychta P. Advancements in aesthetic breast augmentation: Evaluating the safety, efficacy, and naturalistic outcomes of Ergonomix2 implants. Aesth Plast Surg. 2024.doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03994-3

TÉCNICAS QUIRÚRGICAS

Oh YH, Lee SH, Yoon WJ. The key of pocket dissection in transaxillary dual-plane breast augmentation: How to control inferior malposition of smooth implants. J. Plast. Reconstr.Aesthet. Surg. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.046

Serra, P.L., Mariani, M., Fabbri, M. et al. Capsular Contracture After Breast Augmentation: Our Approach to Prevent Reoccurrence with Combined Total Capsulectomy and Implantation of Motiva Ergonomix^® Implants. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04547-4

Sforza M, Hammond DC, Botti G, et al. Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered,Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant. Aesthetic Surg J. 2019;39:S95-S102.doi:10.1093/asj/sjz054

RECONSTRUCCIÓN

Cheema M, Naseem S. Clinical and biomechanical basis of implant based breast reconstruction.Archives of Surgical Research. 2021, 2 (3):38-42.https://doi.org/10.48111/2021.03.06.

Clemens MW, Mitchell MP, Christensen JM, et al. MRI-Conditional Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Radiation Therapy Implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. Published online February 11, 2025. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012029

Hwang NH, Kim M, Lee NK,Lee S, Hwang J. Dosimetric effect of injection ports in tissue expanders on post-mastectomy volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for left-sided breast cancer. Applied Sciences. 2022, 12 (13), 6461. doi:10.3390/app12136461

Shellock FG, Munhoz AM, Bayasgalan M. Breast Tissue Expander With Radiofrequency Identification Port: Assessment of MRI Issues. AJR. 2020 May 14:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22492

RFID

Nelson MT, Brattain KA, Williams JM. Does Electronic Identification Enablement for Silicone Gel Implants Impact Patient Safety? J Surg Open Access. 2018;4(1). doi: 10.16966/2470-0991.162

Nelson MT, Meisamy S. High Risk Breast Cancer Patient with Silicone Breast Implant and Q Inside Safety Micro Transponder. OJMI. Dec 2019;9: 52-57. Doi: 10.4236/ojmi.2019.94005

Meisamy S, Nelson MT. The Effects of Q Inside Safety Technology Micro Transponder on Routine Breast Implant Imaging. OJMI 2019; 11(2): 19-31. Doi: 10.4236/ojmi.2019.92002

Munhoz AM, Chala L, Melo G, Azevedo Marques Neto A, Tucunduva T. Clinical and MRI Evaluation of Silicone Gel Implants with RFID-M Traceability System: A Prospective Controlled Cohort Study Related to Safety and Image Quality in MRI Follow-Up [publicado en línea antes de su impresión, 1 de junio de 2021]. Revista Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2021;10.1007/s00266-021-02355-8. doi:10.1007/s00266-021-02355-8

SATISFACCIÓN DE LAS PACIENTES

Botti G, Botti C, Ciancio F. A single center’s clinical experience with ERGONOMIX breast implants. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2021. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab422

Chacón M, Chacón M & Fassero J. Six-Year Prospective Outcomes of Primary Breast Augmentation with Nano-Surface Implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2018; doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy196

Huemer GM, Wenny R, Aitzetmüller MM, Duscher D. Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;41(6):831e-842e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004367